History
  • No items yet
midpage
Armour v. Union Carbide Corp.
594 S.W.2d 690
Tenn.
1980
Check Treatment

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In this case a controlling issue is whether or not the provisions of Chapter 295 of the Public Acts of 1979, effective July 1, 1979, relative to the payment of workmen’s compensation awards in a lump sum, can be retroactively applied.

In the case of Valles v. Daniel Construction Co., 589 S.W.2d 911 (Tenn.1979), the Court held that the provisions of this Act, which are clearly more than merely procedural in nature, could not be given retroactive application.

The judgment of the trial court purporting to apply the provisions of the statute to a judgment entered prior to its effective date is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith. Costs incident to the appeal will be taxed to appellee; costs in the trial court will be adjudged there.

Case Details

Case Name: Armour v. Union Carbide Corp.
Court Name: Tennessee Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 25, 1980
Citation: 594 S.W.2d 690
Court Abbreviation: Tenn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.