History
  • No items yet
midpage
Armour Packing Co. v. Lovell
44 S.E. 990
| Ga. | 1903
|
Check Treatment
Fish, J.

1. An execution against “ James E. Eeps, agent for the Armour Packing Co.,” is against James E. Leps alone, the words, “ agent for,” etc.,, being merely descriptio personæ. Maxwell v. Collier, 115 Ga. 304.

2. Where a party has an adequate remedy by claim, the successful prosecution, of which would be as effectual as the equitable proceeding, he is not entitled to an injunction, Beysiegel v. Rome Mutual Loan Association 113 Ga. 1071.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Case Details

Case Name: Armour Packing Co. v. Lovell
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 1, 1903
Citation: 44 S.E. 990
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.