History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arizona Yage Assembly v. Garland
2:20-cv-02373
D. Ariz.
Apr 29, 2024
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before: BENNETT, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners’ motion for leave to file a second reply (Docket Entry No. 14) is granted. The Clerk will file the reply attached to Docket Entry No. 14.

Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho , 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (“To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court .”); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court , 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition for a writ

Case 2:20-cv-02373-ROS Document 243 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 2 of mandamus is denied.

DENIED.

2 24-1405

Case Details

Case Name: Arizona Yage Assembly v. Garland
Court Name: District Court, D. Arizona
Date Published: Apr 29, 2024
Docket Number: 2:20-cv-02373
Court Abbreviation: D. Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.