History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arey v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
11 F.R.D. 209
N.D. Ohio
1951
Check Treatment
JONES, Chief Judge.

This is a patent infringement action brought by the owner of the patent. The exclusive licensee of the patent refuses to join as plaintiff and plaintiff now moves to add the licensee as party defendant.

It would appear that the exclusive licensee is a necessary and indispensible party to this action. Since it refuses to join, the licensee may be made a defendant in the action. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule K>, 28 U.S.C.A.

Motion will be sustained.

Case Details

Case Name: Arey v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: Jan 29, 1951
Citation: 11 F.R.D. 209
Docket Number: Civ. No. 25038
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.