No. 99-913; No. 99-963; No. 99-1103; No. 99-1128; No. 99-1138; No. 99-1188; No. 99-6905; No. 99-7062; No. 99-7067; No. 99-7165; No. 99-7166; No. 99-7197; No. 99-7200; No. 99-7302; No. 99-7360; No. 99-7405; No. 99-7417; No. 99-7465; No. 99-7518; No. 99-7532; No. 99-7577; No. 99-7625; No. 99-7640; No. 99-7654; No. 99-7678; No. 99-7694; No. 99-7706; No. 99-7707; No. 99-7776; No. 99-7784; No. 99-7796; No. 99-7842; No. 99-7931; No. 99-7996 | SCOTUS | Apr 17, 2000

*1083528 U.S. 1155" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/stearns-v-city-of-gig-harbor-9260960?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9260960">528 U. S. 1155;

528 U.S. 1156" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hatley-v-mccarter-9260961?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9260961">528 U. S. 1156;

528 U.S. 1160" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/white-v-security-pacific-financial-services-inc-9261023?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261023">528 U. S. 1160;

528 U.S. 1161" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/guzman-v-texas-9261033?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261033">528 U. S. 1161;

528 U.S. 1161" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/guzman-v-texas-9261033?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261033">528 U. S. 1161;

528 U.S. 1162" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/spence-v-united-states-9261058?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261058">528 U. S. 1162;

528 U.S. 1163" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/mckendrick-v-united-states-9261066?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261066">528 U. S. 1163;

528 U.S. 1164" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/taylor-v-north-carolina-9261074?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261074">528 U. S. 1164;

528 U.S. 1123" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-01-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/valdes-v-florida-9259186?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9259186">528 U. S. 1123;

528 U.S. 1140" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-01-24" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/davis-v-united-states-9259399?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9259399">528 U. S. 1140;

528 U.S. 1141" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-01-24" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/weatherspoon-v-united-states-9259418?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9259418">528 U. S. 1141;

528 U.S. 1164" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/taylor-v-north-carolina-9261074?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261074">528 U. S. 1164;

528 U.S. 1164" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/taylor-v-north-carolina-9261074?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261074">528 U. S. 1164;

528 U.S. 1166" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/gilbert-v-moody-9261112?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261112">528 U. S. 1166;

528 U.S. 1167" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/pratt-v-texas-9261119?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261119">528 U. S. 1167;

528 U.S. 1152" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-tarver-9260921?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9260921">528 U. S. 1152;

528 U.S. 1168" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/sheppard-v-ohio-9261137?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261137">528 U. S. 1168;

528 U.S. 1170" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/cross-v-michigan-9261173?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261173">528 U. S. 1170;

528 U.S. 1152" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-tarver-9260921?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9260921">528 U. S. 1152;

528 U.S. 1172" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/shavers-v-florida-9261191?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261191">528 U. S. 1172;

528 U.S. 1173" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/shannon-v-florida-9261210?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261210">528 U. S. 1173;

528 U.S. 1174" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/lewis-v-ohio-9261228?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261228">528 U. S. 1174;

528 U.S. 1175" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/grisso-v-leary-9261239?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261239">528 U. S. 1175;

528 U.S. 1175" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/grisso-v-leary-9261239?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261239">528 U. S. 1175;

*1084No. 99-7678. No. 99-7694. No. 99-7706. No. 99-7707. No. 99-7776. No. 99-7784. No. 99-7796. No. 99-7842. No. 99-7931. No. 99-7996.

528 U.S. 1176" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/french-v-california-9261257?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261257">528 U. S. 1176;

528 U.S. 1176" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/french-v-california-9261257?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261257">528 U. S. 1176;

ante, p. 1008;

528 U.S. 1177" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/kalway-v-moody-9261265?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261265">528 U. S. 1177;

528 U.S. 1193" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-28" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/donley-v-illinois-9261455?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261455">528 U. S. 1193;

ante, p. 1025;

528 U.S. 1193" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-28" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/donley-v-illinois-9261455?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261455">528 U. S. 1193;

528 U.S. 1152" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-tarver-9260921?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9260921">528 U. S. 1152;

528 U.S. 1195" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-28" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/cook-v-united-states-9261485?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261485">528 U. S. 1195; and

528 U.S. 1196" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2000-02-28" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/trent-v-united-states-9261497?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9261497">528 U. S. 1196. Petitions for rehearing denied.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.