History
  • No items yet
midpage
Archie v. State
710 So. 2d 234
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1998
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Freddie Dee Archie appeals his conviction for aggravated assault, contending that he was improperly denied a peremptory challenge. Our review of the record fails to reveal — and the State is unable to point to— the demonstrations required to be made by the State, as the party opposing the peremptory challenge, that the challenged person is a member of a distinct racial group, and that the peremptory challenge is motivated by that fact. Archie’s peremptory challenge was therefore improperly denied. See Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984). Archie’s conviction and sentence are reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Archie v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 20, 1998
Citation: 710 So. 2d 234
Docket Number: No. 97-2141
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.