midpage

Arbuckle v. McCoyArbuckle v. McCoy

Indiana Supreme Court
May 15, 1876
Reporters:
Before:
Downey
Downey, C. J.

Where the court has improperly refused ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‍to grant a continuance, the ruling must be made a ground *64of a motion for ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‍a new trial, in order to present the question to this court, and then ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‍it must be done by assigning as error the overruling of the motion for ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‍a new trial. Carr v. Eaton, 42 Ind. 385, and cases cited; Buskirk‘s Pr. 224.

The judgment is affirmed, ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‍with five per cent, damages and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Arbuckle v. McCoy
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1876
Citation: 53 Ind. 63
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
Log In