Araujo v. Marion Mixers, Inc.Araujo v. Marion Mixers, Inc.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff, Marion Mixers, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated September 27, 2000, as, upon a jury verdict finding that the plaintiff Jose Araujo had sustained damages of $1,145,714 for past pain and suffering, $3,874,286 for future pain and suffering, and $500,000 for future lost wages, and that the plaintiff Trinidad Araujo had sustained damages of $150,000 for past loss of services and $350,000 for future loss of services, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it, and the third-party defendants, Cosco Enterprises, Inc., and M. Schneider Soap and Chemical Co., Inc., separately appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same judgment as, upon a jury verdict finding that the plaintiff Jose Araujo had sustained damages of $1,145,714 for past pain and suffering, $3,874,286 for future pain and suffering, $80,000 for past lost wages, and $500,000 for future lost wages, and that the plaintiff Trinidad Araujo had sustained damages of $150,000 for past loss of services and $350,000 for future loss of services, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, by deleting the provisions thereof awarding the plaintiff Jose Araujo damages in the sum of $1,145,714 for past pain and suffering, $3,874,286 for future pain and suffering, and $500,000 for future lost wages, and the plaintiff Trinidad Araujo the sum of $150,000 for past loss of services and $350,000 for future loss of services, and granting a new trial on the issue of damages with respect thereto; as so
The 40-year old plaintiff Jose Araujo lost his left arm just below the shoulder while cleaning a mixing machine at his place of employment. His arm could not be reattached.
The damages awarded for past and future pain and suffering, future lost wages, and past and future loss of services are excessive to the extent indicated because they deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances of this case (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; see generally, Burton v New York City Hous. Auth.,