No. 85-1931 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Mar 25, 1987
Defendant, a juvenile, appeals from his sentence for grand theft.
Defendant’s first point on appeal is that restitution was improper. We disagree. See J.S.H. v. State, 472 So. 2d 737" date_filed="1985-07-03" court="Fla." case_name="JSH v. State">472 So.2d 737, 738 (Fla.1985).
Defendant’s second point, which the state concedes, is that the written order should conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of twenty-four hours of community service work and that the term of community control should be specified m accordance with F.R. v. State, 473 So. 2d 785" date_filed="1985-08-07" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="FR v. State">473 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We agree.
The cause is remanded for correction of the sentence in accordance with this opinion.