Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
1 Indian Terr. 393 | Ct. App. Ind. Terr. | 1896
The facts in this case are substa tially the same as the facts in case No. 64, Insurance Co. Kearney, 1 Ind. Ter. 828; and, for the reasons given int] opinion in that case, the petition for an alternative writ mandamus is refused.
