SC 14743 | Conn. | Apr 13, 1993
The defendant city of Milford’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 334" court="Conn. App. Ct." date_filed="1993-02-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/appeal-from-probate-of-bencivenga-7854995?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7854995">30 Conn. App. 334 (AC 11155), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Where an executrix is removed for cause, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the named successor executors are aggrieved by a Probate Court’s appointment of an administrator, c.t.a.?
“2. Where more than ten years have elapsed since the appointment of an executor, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that General Statutes § 45a-290 (c) requires the appointment of the named successor executors, despite the provisions of General Statutes § 45a-331 which vests the Probate Court with discretion to settle a decedent’s estate?”