midpage

Anthony v. WingfieldAnthony v. Wingfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 7, 1915
5927
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Broyles
Broyles, J.

Where the grounds of a motion for a ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‍new trial are dependent upon a consideration of the evidence, and a brief of the evidence ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‍has not been prepared in even substantial compliance with section 6093 of the Civil Code, this ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‍court will not attempt to review the discretion of the trial judge in overruling such grounds. Grier v. Brown, 118 Ga. 670 ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‍(45 S. E. 455); Wall v. Mercer, 119 Ga. 346 (46 S. E. 420); Gairdner v. Tate, 121 Ga. 253 (48 S. E. 907); Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (75 S. E. 254); Albany &c. ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‍R. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga. App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114). Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Anthony v. Wingfield
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 7, 1915
Citations: 16 Ga. App. 310; 85 S.E. 284; 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 602; 5927
Docket Number: 5927
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In