History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anthony v. State
598 So. 2d 149
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appellant, James Lee Anthony, challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court properly denied the appellant’s motion on *150all of the grounds that he ruled upon, and we, accordingly, affirm.

The court declined to rule on appellant’s contention that his sentence was illegal. Although this contention was raised in the appellant's motion, he had raised the identical argument in a separate motion to correct an illégal sentence. The motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), was pending before the trial court at the time the motion which is the subject of this appeal was ruled upon. The appellant will have an opportunity to appeal any adverse ruling entered in that matter once it is concluded.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Anthony v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 17, 1992
Citation: 598 So. 2d 149
Docket Number: No. 92-01099
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.