History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anthony v. State
65 S.E. 816
Ga. Ct. App.
1909
Check Treatment
Russell, J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no-error in refusing a new trial.

2. Tt is not error to instruct the jury that after having arrived at the truth of the case so far as the facts are concerned, they shall apply to these facts the law as given in charge by the court.

3. In the absence of a timely written request asking explicit instructions, the fact that a proposition which might properly have been stated to the jury more lucidly and more fully is not thus presented affords no ground for new trial, where the general principles of law involved in the case are fairly presented. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Anthony v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 13, 1909
Citation: 65 S.E. 816
Docket Number: 2058
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.