History
  • No items yet
midpage
2:25-cv-11992
C.D. Cal.
Feb 28, 2026

ANTHONY G ZARATE, Plaintiff, v. RAC ACCEPTANCE EAST, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:25-cv-11992-FLA (PVCx)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

February 28, 2026

JS-6

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION [DKT. 18]

On February 27, 2026, the parties filed a notice of settlement (“Notice“), stating the parties had agreed to settle the action and anticipated filing a stipulation to dismiss the action after satisfaction of the terms of settlement. Dkt. 18.

Having considered the Notice and finding good cause therefor, the court hereby ORDERS:

  1. All deadlines governing this action are VACATED.
  2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, provided any request by a party to do so shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 60-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party making such a request reasonably expects the process to be concluded.
  3. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require approval of the court. Such stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 60-day period, or by such later date ordered by the court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms to the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2026

FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA

United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Anthony G Zarate v. RAC Acceptance East, LLC
Court Name: District Court, C.D. California
Date Published: Feb 28, 2026
Citation: 2:25-cv-11992
Docket Number: 2:25-cv-11992
Court Abbreviation: C.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Anthony G Zarate v. RAC Acceptance East, LLC, 2:25-cv-11992