History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ansley v. Davidson & Co.
110 Ga. 279
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, P. J.

There was no brief of the evidence in this case, nor bona fide attempt to make one. The document purporting to be such was a detailed report of the trial, including, without even the appearance of necessity, all manner of useless and irrelevant matter. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Southern Mining Company v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264; Price v. High cG Co., 108 Ga. 145, and cases therein cited. If any error was committed at the trial below, the plaintiff in error has not, as it was incumbent upon him to do, affirmatively, and in the manner prescribed by law, so shown to this court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Ansley v. Davidson & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 30, 1899
Citation: 110 Ga. 279
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.