History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anonymous
3 N.C. 327
Sup. Ct. N.C.
1804
Check Treatment

said he had long doubted exceedingly of that decision; but as it had been decided by the Court of Conference, he would not undertake to overrule it. But if a proper case was made, he would carry it to the Court of Conference for their reconsideration. Most clearly, if the delivery was made to the plaintiff by the intervening person to whom it was delivered for the plaintiff's benefit, before the terms were complied with in which the delivery to him was authorized by the defendant, it was done without authority, and could not be considered as his delivery, and so not his bond.

NOTE. — See Smallwood v. Clark, 1 N.C. 205; but see, contra,Moore v. Parker, 5 N.C. 37; S. c., 1 N.C.

(328)

Case Details

Case Name: Anonymous
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 5, 1804
Citation: 3 N.C. 327
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.