History
  • No items yet
midpage
ANISSA NICOLE SANANTONIO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
21-0261
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Jul 7, 2021
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before EMAS, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See J.B. v. State, 73 So. 3d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); State v. Clyatt, 976 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). See also Bush v. State, 295 So. 3d 179, 200-01 (Fla. 2020) (abolishing the “special” standard of appellate review for circumstantial evidence cases, and holding that the standard of review to be applied to a determination of the legal sufficiency of evidence in support of a criminal conviction (regardless of the circumstantial nature of the evidence) is whether the State presented competent, substantial evidence and, viewing that evidence in the light most favorable to the State, whether a rational trier of fact could have found the State established the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt).

2

Case Details

Case Name: ANISSA NICOLE SANANTONIO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 7, 2021
Docket Number: 21-0261
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.