midpage

Anglin v. WardenAnglin v. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court
Dec 20, 1973
No. 7075
Reporters:
, ,

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The district court denied a post-conviction application to modify a criminal sentence since the ‍​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍petitioner failed to satisfy any of the preconditions designated by NRS 177.315(1 ).1

Affirmed.

Notes

NRS 177.315(1). “Any person convicted of a crime and under sentence of death or imprisonment who claims that ‍​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍the conviction was obtained, or that the sentence was imposed, in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the constitution or laws of this state, or that ‍​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍the court was without jurisdiction to impose the sentence, or that the sentence exceeds the maximum authorized by law, or that the conviction or sentence is otherwise subject to ‍​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍collateral attack upon any ground of alleged error heretofore available under any common law, statutory or other writ, motion, petition, proceeding or remedy, may, without paying a filing fee, ‍​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍apply for post-conviction relief from the conviction or sentence.” This statute has since been amended.

Case Details

Case Name: Anglin v. Warden
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 20, 1973
Citations: 516 P.2d 740; 89 Nev. 563; 1973 Nev. LEXIS 588; No. 7075
Docket Number: No. 7075
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
Log In