History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anfora v. Liberty Communications
737 P.2d 977
Or. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Claimant and Liberty Communications, claimant’s first employer, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance, that employer’s insurer, seek judicial review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order holding that claimant’s present disability is the result of an aggravation of a back injury he suffered in 1982 while working for Liberty Communications. In so holding, the Board reversed the referee, who had determined that claimant’s present disability is a result of a new injury he suffered while working for Cable Communications in 1984.

On de novo review, we are persuaded that the referee was correct. Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361, 565 P2d 138 (1976).

Reversed and remanded on petition and on cross-petition with instructions to reinstate referee’s opinion and order.

Case Details

Case Name: Anfora v. Liberty Communications
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jun 17, 1987
Citation: 737 P.2d 977
Docket Number: WCB 85-03807, 85-03808, 85-06955, 85-06956; CA A40575
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.