History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andrews v. Wade
3 Sadler 133
Pa.
1886
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The learned judge gave due effect to the agreement, reserving the pine and hemlock trees growing on the land. It applied to living trees, then of suitable size for use.

A person having a right to cut and remove timber growing on the land of another may be compelled to take it off after a reasonable time, under all the circumstances, or he will be presumed to have relinquished all right thereto. When one having a lien on goods sets up a claim hostile to the rights of the owner and wrongfully sells the entire property, he cannot set up the lien as a bar to an action against him, for his illegal act. We see no error in the charge nor in the answer to the point.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Andrews v. Wade
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 4, 1886
Citation: 3 Sadler 133
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.