224 F. 418 | 9th Cir. | 1915
The plaintiffs in error were convicted and sentenced upon two counts of an indictment, the first of which charged them with conspiring to commit a crime against the United
. [4] Error is assigned to the denial of the motion of plaintiffs in error in arrest of judgment. In Street Railroad Co. v. Hart, 114 U. S. 654, 5 Sup. Ct. 1127, 29 L. Ed. 226, the court said that such a motion “had no more effect than a motion for a new trial, and therefore, under our settled practice, cannot be reviewed here on this writ of error.”
We find no error. The judgment is affirmed.