History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andrews v. Thum
72 F. 290
1st Cir.
1896
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The mandate has been correctly drawn. Although the record shows a Anal decree in May, yet, in fact, that decree was suspended by a motion for rehearing, and did not take effect and become operative till that motion was overruled, in June. The appeal was from this decree when it took effect, and became the final decree in the cause. It is unnecessary in the mandate to make recitation of every step in the various stages of the cause.

The mandate as drawn by the clerk is ordered to issue.

Case Details

Case Name: Andrews v. Thum
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Feb 15, 1896
Citation: 72 F. 290
Docket Number: No. 89
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.