History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andrews v. State
390 So. 2d 61
Fla.
1980
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ of certiorari must be and is hereby discharged.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(d).

It is so ordered.

Opinion Below: 372 So.2d 143.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur. ENGLAND, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Andrews v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Nov 6, 1980
Citation: 390 So. 2d 61
Docket Number: No. 57496
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.