90 F.3d 102
4th Cir.1996Lead Opinion
ORDER
Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc, voting for rehearing en banc were Judges Russell, Widener and Hall, and voting against rehearing en banc were Judges Wilkinson, Murnaghan, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton, Luttig, Williams, Michael and Motz. Judge Ervin did not participate in this decision.
It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc shall be, and it hereby is, denied.
The panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of opinion it is without merit.
It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing shall be, and it hereby is denied.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents. He would grant rehearing for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion.
