History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andrews Co. v. Dorsett
29 Ga. App. 321
Ga. Ct. App.
1922
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

I am authorized by my associates to announce the following as their opinion in this case:

" The defendant’s plea, as amended, was insufficient to set up a good defense to the suit.
" (a) The objection that an action is prematurely brought, unless *324the defect appears on the face of the pleading, can be raised only by a timely, formal, verified plea in abatement. Gate City Fire Ins. Co. v. Thornton, 5 Ga. App. 585 (63 S. E. 638). There was no such plea in this case, and, under the above ruling, the trial court did not err in striking the defendant’s plea and the amendment thereto, on motion of the plaintiff, or in thereafter directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the amount sued for. It follows that the judge of the superior court erred in sustaining the certiorari.”

My opinion is that the judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. Blood-worth, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Andrews Co. v. Dorsett
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 11, 1922
Citation: 29 Ga. App. 321
Docket Number: 13473
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.