History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andrew Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor Tennessee Valley Authority
34 F.3d 368
| 6th Cir. | 1994
|
Check Treatment

34 F.3d 368

Andrew BARTLIK, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TENNESSEE VALLEY
AUTHORITY, Respondents.

Nos. 93-3616, 93-3834.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1994.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Case Details

Case Name: Andrew Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor Tennessee Valley Authority
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 2, 1994
Citation: 34 F.3d 368
Docket Number: 93-3616
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.