History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andres Solis Vielma v. State
04-14-00742-CR
| Tex. App. | Oct 16, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 FORIRTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTINUD, TEXAS

EXTENSION OF TIME / FOR RE- HEARING

NO: 04-14-DD742-CR

ANDRES SOLIS, VIEIMA APPEIIANT V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPEIIE.

FORIRTH COURT OF APPEALS OFFICE OF THE CLERK. BEXAR COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER 300 HOLDROSA, SUITE 3200 SAN ANTINUD, TEXAS 78208

*2 TO. THE FOURTH COURT OF ADDEALS HISTRICT

REASON: TIME FOR EXTENSION ( 40 DAVS) APPEIIANT ATTORNEY RESUESTER, REHEARING

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

HERE YOU FIND ANDRES SOLIS VIELMA TICJ 1910.4402 PRO-SE LYHICH 19 RE QUESTING AN APPELLATE ATTORNEY!N BE HALF OF LACK OF KNOWLEGE OF THE APPEALS SYSTEM AND ITS PROCESS TO SEEK. A FAIR COURT HEARING, TO RAISE TRUE FACTS AND PROCEDURES OF THE COURTS OF TEXAS.

THE REASON FOR A REHEARING AND EXTENSION ARE HERE LIST IN NUNIERAL NUMBERS. STYLE,

I.

MAY ATTORNEY FILED AN ANDERS BRIEF TO WITHORAL AS MU COUNSEL.

II

THAT I ANDRES VIELMA WAS LAMABLE TO URTAIN LEGAL BOOKS TO FILE NUY DUN MOTIONS OR TO HAVE ANU ACCESS TO (2 OF 5.)

*3 COURT PERTAINING TO THE DEAD LINES TO ANY COURT MOTIONS.

II.

NOV THAT I AM HERE AT THE DOMINOSEZ STATE JAIL THE LAW LIBRARY ONLY GIVES LIMITED TIME AND IT HAS A HOLDINGS THAT AIIOUS THEM TO HAVE ONLY A CERTAIN LEGAL MATERIAL THAT BEST MEET THE NEEDS OF A SEIFHEID PERSON THAT IS PRO SE.

III.

AND AED SO FOR THE INJANITY OF THE DEFENDANT WHICH LIASE IGNORED BY THE COURTS, THE FIRST IN THE 35th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, OF LIVAIDE COUNTY, TEXAS.

IV.

THE EUINENCE AND WITTINES LIMERE NEVER CHAIRINGED IN COURT TO SEEK THE TRLLETH. THE STATE NEVER BRADHY FORTH THE WITTINES FOR CROSS-EXZAMINA TION.

*4 TO THE FOURTH COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF SANU ANUTONIO TEXAS HERE THE COURS PIERANUS FOR RELIEF IN THIS MATTER. PLEASE NOTFIE All PARTIES INVOLVED IN THIS MATTER AND COPIES BE FORWARDED SO THAT All PARTIES ARE UNIDERSTANDING THE RIGHT TO REGUEST A NELJ HEARING. BASED ON THE LACK OF (HEIP) ATTORNEY IN THIS MATTER.

PLEASE AT THIS TIME YOUR HELP AND THE HELP OF THE APPEALS BOARD IS NEED EN TO RESOLVE MATTERS THAT ARE NOT BEEN PROUEW TO BE FACTS, BUT DUE PROCESS LOHICH THE STATE HAS NOT PROVIDED TRUE FACTS OR GIVE THE BEFENANSE DEFENSE THE ACCESS TO COURT THAT IS WEEDED TO REPRESENT TO THE STATE TRUE FACTS AND NOT ONLY THE SO SAID FACTS THAT THE STATE HAS BROUCH FORDARD (DNE SIDED) STORE, (STATEMENT)

*5 I ANDRES VIEINA TOCI* 1964 MOZ BENUS HOLLED AT THE FOMINGEZ LIMIT, SAW ANTINIO TY. ASK THAT THIS REDUEST BE EXCEPTED ON THE FOLDDING REASONS.

THANK YOU RESECTFUIIY

Andres VIEINA OTPENDRE SIGNATURE 10 − 13 − 15 DATE

ANDRES VIELMA *TOCT 1964402 DOMINGEZ STATE JAL 6535 CAGNOW ROAD SAW ANTONIO TX 78253.

*6

Case Details

Case Name: Andres Solis Vielma v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 16, 2015
Docket Number: 04-14-00742-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.