Anderson v. State
632 So. 2d 136
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction on the authority of Smith v. State, 632 So.2d 136, Case No. 93-0189, opinion issued February 9, 1994. The state concedes a sentencing error because the written sentence does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, and we therefore reverse and remand for resen-tencing in conformance with the oral pronouncement of sentence.

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.