History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. State
49 Tex. Crim. 195
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1906
|
Check Treatment

Conviction for violating the local option law. On February 15, 1900, the commissioners court ordered an election in a portion of justice precinct number 6 of Navarro County. This subdivision of said justice precinct embraces five school districts. The contention is that under this order of the court the election was void, because school districts could not be combined. This contention is correct. Ex parte Heyman, 45 Tex.Crim. Rep., 78 S.W. Rep., 349, 9 Texas Ct. Rep., 140; Ex parte Mills, 79 S.W. Rep., 555; Ex parte Mitchell, 79 S.W. Rep., 558; Ex parte Wells, 78 S.W. Rep., 928; Board v. Buchanan, 82 S.W. Rep., 194, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 652; Nolan Co. v. Beall, 81 S.W. Rep., 526, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 526. The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 31, 1906
Citation: 49 Tex. Crim. 195
Docket Number: No. 3327.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.