midpage

Anderson v. StateAnderson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 21, 1929
No. A-7024.
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‍of Pittsburg county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‍jail for 30 days.

The defendant first contends that the affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued was insufficient to authorize the issuance of a warrant ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‍thereon. An examination of the affidavit discloses that it is based wholly on *381 information and belief and contains no facts upon which isuch belief could be predicated.

The ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‍affidavit being insufficient, the search and seizure was illegal, and the evidence obtained by such search inadmissible. It was error for the trial court to overrule ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‍the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence.

For the reasons stated the cause is reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Date Published: Dec 21, 1929
Citations: 283 P. 588; 1929 OK CR 564; 45 Okla. Crim. 380; 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 566; No. A-7024.
Docket Number: No. A-7024.
Court Abbreviation: Okla. Crim. App.
Log In