History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. Peterson
125 Minn. 534
Minn.
1914
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The only question presented in this case is whether the version of the transaction given by plaintiff or that given by defendant is correct. They flatly contradict each other. It is the province of the jury to determine controverted ques*535tions of fact, and tlieir decision, if reasonably supported by the evidence, is binding upon the court. The disputed questions were properly submitted to the jury and they have found in favor of plaintiff. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the record discloses no ground which will justify this court in setting it aside.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Peterson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: May 29, 1914
Citation: 125 Minn. 534
Docket Number: Nos. 18,557 — (89)
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.