History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. McMichael
6 Pa. Super. 114
Pa. Super. Ct.
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The question raised by the motion to quash is ruled by our decision in Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, and the cases there cited, and needs no discussion. The order appealed from is neither a final judgment nor an order in the nature of a final judgment, but is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie.

The appeal is quashed at the cost of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. McMichael
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 13, 1897
Citation: 6 Pa. Super. 114
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 154
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.