History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. Maxwell
10 Ohio St. 2d 188
Ohio
1967
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In each of these actions in habeas corpus, the petitioner is being held pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a court of record which had jurisdiction to render the judgment. In each of these cases, the petitioner has sought and been denied relief under the postconviction statutes, and is seeking the same relief in habeas corpus.

The petitioners are remanded to custody on the authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, Warden, 4 Ohio St. 2d 4.

Petitioners remanded to custody.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Maxwell
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 3, 1967
Citation: 10 Ohio St. 2d 188
Docket Number: Nos. 40586, 40611, 40617, 40785, 40786, 40824, 40825, 40860 and 40874
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.