History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. Line
14 F. 405
U.S. Cir. Ct.
1880
Check Treatment

On April 28, 1880, the following opinion was delivered by— •

McKennan, C. J.

The right of the plaintiff to recover was resisted upon the ground that the real defendant was a married woman, and was not, therefore, liable. The question of her liability was reserved by the court. She was sued as a married woman by reason of her ownership as such of stock in a national bank, transferred to her by her husband, and a certificate for which was obtained for, delivered to, and held by her.

The court being of opinion that her coverture does not exempt her from the liability imposed by the national currency acts upon all stockholders in national banks, therefore decide the question reserved against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff, and order judgment to be entered on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

*406On May 1,1880, the court opened the above judgment, and the case was subsequently reargued.

On November 30, 1880, the court again entered judgment in favor of plaintiff, but without delivering any opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Line
Court Name: United States Circuit Court
Date Published: Nov 30, 1880
Citation: 14 F. 405
Court Abbreviation: U.S. Cir. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.