Error from the supreme court. This was an action of covenant by the executors of a tenant to recover of a landlord for improvements made on the demised premises, during the continuance of the term, under a covenant contained in the lease, whereby the landlord had bound himself to pay whatever the improvements should be appraised at, not exceeding a certain sum. A recovery was had against the landlord, and he applied for a new trial which was granted, as will be seen by reference to 6 Cowen, 302, because in estimating the amount, ordinary repairs were included in the appraisement. In the second trial those repairs were omitted, and the landlord again applied for a new trial, contending that by the terms of the covenant he was not liable, except for the value of new buildings, if any, erected by the ten
Anderson v. Lametti
6 Wend. 326
Court for the Trial of Impeach...1830Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
