History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. Commonwealth
142 Ky. 446
Ky. Ct. App.
1911
Check Treatment

Opinion of The Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

This prosecution was for the violation.of the local option law which was in force in Ashland, Ky. There was no objection before or during the trial to the indictment, by demurrer or otherwise, nor were there any objections made to the testimony, except to the introduction of the United States Government license which were held by *447appellant; nor was there any objection to the instructions given by the court. Under this state of the record, it is unnecessary for the court to consider and discuss the matters raised in appellant’s brief. There was some evidence of guilt and we will not disturb the finding of the jury.

Nor these reasons the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Date Published: Feb 23, 1911
Citation: 142 Ky. 446
Court Abbreviation: Ky. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.