History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. Brown
273 A.D. 940
N.Y. App. Div.
1948
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: In view of the disposition herein made, we do not at this time determine whether the six-year or the ten-year Statute of Limitations applies. That question may be raised again when the real situation is disclosed from the pleadings or by facts appearing upon the trial. (See Goldstein v. Schachne, 261 App. Div. 922; Hurley v. Hurley, 266 App. Div. 701.) All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in an action to declare a quitclaim deed null and void.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Brown
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 17, 1948
Citation: 273 A.D. 940
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.