Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co.
366 A.2d 894
Pa.
1976
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Our disposition of these consolidated appeals is controlled by our decision in Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa.-, 366 A.2d 882 (1976).

In No. 108 March Term, 1975, the order of the Superi- or Court is affirmed.

In No. 317 January Term, 1975, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which POMEROY and NIX, JJ., join.



Dissenting Opinion

ROBERTS, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa.-,-, 366 A.2d 882, 889, 892 (1976) (ROBERTS, J., joined by POMEROY and NIX, JJ.; and POMEROY, J., joined by ROBERTS and NIX, JJ.).

POMEROY and NIX, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.