midpage

Anderson v. BaughmanAnderson v. Baughman

Michigan Supreme Court
May 10, 1859
Reporters:
The Chief Justice:

The notice is sufficient. Rule 1 governs this case.*

Notes

Rulo 7 is as follows: “The day on which any rule shall be ‍​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‍entered, or order, notice, pleading, or paper served, shall be excluded in the computation of the time for complying with the exigency of such rule, order or notice, pleading or paper, and *299the day on wliicb a compliance therewith is required, ‍​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‍shall be included, except where it shall fall on a Sunday, in which case the party shall have the next day to comply therewith. When by the terms of any order an act is directed to be performed instanter, it shall ‍​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‍be done in twenty-four hours.”

The rule in respect to notices of hearing is as follows: “Rule 26. Notices of special motions, and of the argument of calendar causes, when necessary, shall be notices of at least ten days where the ‍​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‍attorney of the adverse party resides over one hundred miles from the place of hearing; if over fifty and less than one hundred miles, of at least six days, and in all other cases of at least four days; and ‍​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‍a copy of the affidavits and other papers on which any motion shall be made, shall be served with such notice.”

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Baughman
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: May 10, 1859
Citation: 6 Mich. 298
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
Log In