16 S.D. 513 | S.D. | 1903
Plaintiff, a corporation created by and existing under the laws of Texas, instituted this proceeding for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the Insurance Commissioner to issue a certificate 'authorizing the transaction of business in this state for the period of one year from and after January 1, 1902, and this appeal is from a judgment accordingly entered. .
Whether respondent must pay a 2 per cent tax each year, before it is lawfully entitled to a certificate of authority to transact business through its grand and subordinate lodges, is the controlling question in the case. The statute to be construed is contained in chapter 51, p. 124, Laws 1890, entitled “An act to regulate and control life or accident insurance companies, fidelity or surety companies, mutual assessment, co operative or natural premium plan benefit or accident indemnity companies or associations, and fraternal, benevolent and secret societies organized or operated for the purpose of paying death benefits upon the assessment plan. ” The first 31 sections of the act (pages 124-132) have reference to the regulation and control of general life insurance companies, and the remaining provisions relate exclusively to assessment and mutual benefit associations, wherein it is expressly provided that the latter “shall not be subject to the general insurance laws of this state' regulating life insurance.” After placing certain restrictions upon the organization of assessment companies and
The declared objects of the Ancient Order of United Workmen are: “(1) To unite white male persons, regardless of nationality, political preferences or denominational distinction, into a fraternal brotherhood, the members of which recognize and believe in the existence of a Supreme Being, the Creator and Preserver of the Universe, (2) The adoption of such secret work and means of recognition as will enable the members to make themselves known to each other wherever the order exists. (3) To embrace and give equal consideration to all
That respondent is clearly within the statutory exemption* is too plain for argument, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.