History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York
379 U.S. 5
| SCOTUS | 1964
|
Check Treatment
379 U.S. 5 (1964)

AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS' OFFSET CORP. ET AL.
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.

No. 152.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 12, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Harold Riegelman and H. H. Nordlinger for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for the City of New York et al., and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Gustave Soderberg, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Case Details

Case Name: Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 12, 1964
Citation: 379 U.S. 5
Docket Number: 152
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.