22 Ga. App. 348 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1918
The Continental Trust Company brought suit against Mrs. Tero C. Amos for $20,000. She„ demurred to the petition generally and specially and filed an answer, various portions of which were demurred to by the plaintiff. • The court overruled the demurrer to the petition, and sustained the plaintiff’s demurrer, as to various paragraphs of the answer, and struck certain paragraphs, and ordered that other paragraphs be stricken unless amended to meet special grounds of the demurrer. Thereupon the case was referred to an auditor, upon proper application; the order - of the court reciting, that it appeared that the cause involved complicated and intricate questions of account, and that the facts and circumstances of the ease were such as to make a reference to an auditor proper and necessary. The defendant filed a bill of exceptions, assigning error on the overruling of her demurrer to the petition, and upon the sustaining of the plaintiff’s demurrer as to certain paragraphs of the answer, and upon the action of the court in referring the case to an auditor.
. The suit was based upon an alleged contract of guaranty, and the facts, as stated in the petition under which the contract was entered into and upon which it was claimed the liability of the defendant arose, were briefly as follows: The Commercial & Savings Bank was a banking corporation doing business in the city of Macon, and on August 1, 1914, made application to the Continental''Trust Company to pay off for it all of its indebtedness to its depositors and other creditors, proposing to transfer as security for such payment its entire assets of every kind and character. The trust company concluded, after examination, that the assets of the bank were insufficient to pay off its ascertained liabilities, and declined to assume the payment thereof on this' security. To induce the trust company to assume the payment of the hank’s
The bond executed by the directors and the undertaking entered into by Mrs. Amos appear in the record as follows:
“Georgia, Bibb county.
Know all men by these presents, that whereas the Commercial & Savings Bank, of this city, is unable to meet in due course.its obligations to its depositors and other creditors, and whereas, by resolution of their respective boards of directors, the Commercial & Savings Bank and the Continental Trust Company have agreed
E. Y. Mallary $25,000.00
E. N. Jelks 25,000.00
E. N. Lewis 20,000.00
J. J. Cobb 15,000.00
L. S. Dure 5,000.00
A. W. Lane 5,000.00
Cecil Morgan 5,000.00
the said respective amounts, or such portion thereof as may be necessary, to be paid, Continental Trust Company as demanded by it; and in the event of the payment by any one of the undersigned of said respective amounts or any part thereof, the said Continental Trust Company shall, upon a final liquidation of the affairs of the said bank, and after accounting to the national banks for the amounts advanced by them, account to the undersigned respectively for any surplus remaining out of said assets after the payment of the liabilities of said bank, in-proportion to the amounts so paid in by the undersigned.
In witness whereof the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals and delivered these presents this August 3, 1914.
(Signed) E. Y. Mallary (L. S.)
E. N. Jelks (L. S.)
E. N. Lewis (L. S.)
J. J. Cobb (L. S.)
A. W. Lane (L. S.)
Cecil Morgan (L. S.)
Leon S. Dure (L. S.)
Georgia, Bibb county. The undersigned, Mrs. Tero C. Amos, contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this instrument and as a part thereof guarantees the prompt and punctual performance of the obligation of said E. N. Lewis and the prompt and punctual payment by him of-the amount set opposite his name in said instrument; and I further agree that in the event said E. N. Lewis shall execute and deliver, as hereinabove provided, his note evidencing the amount of his obligation, to indorse the same as security.
Witness my hand and seal and the delivery of these presents this August 3rd, 1914. [Signed] Mrs. Tero C. Amos (L. S.)”
The points raised by the various grounds of the demurrer to the petition, which were overruled, are sufficiently indicated in the headnotes above, so far as it .is deemed necessary to. pass speeifie
As indicated above, the ruling - of the court below on the demurrers to the answer can not be considered; and the judgment overruling the demurrer to the petition is affirmed, as is also the judgment appointing an auditor to hear and determine the issues of law and fact in this proceeding.
Judgment affirmed.