History
  • No items yet
midpage
Amos Parrish & Co. v. Kriegel
28 Misc. 2d 501
N.Y. App. Term.
1960
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The notation on the check that it is an advance against commissions to be earned does not necessarily make the advance a loan, despite the added words “ to be adjusted every month”. Nor was the asserted agreement for a flat salary during the training period inconsistent with the commission arrangement. Hence there were triable issues both on the plaintiff’s cause of action and the counterclaim.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur—Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Amos Parrish & Co. v. Kriegel
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Jul 7, 1960
Citation: 28 Misc. 2d 501
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.