History
  • No items yet
midpage
Amerson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
153 S.E. 778
Ga. Ct. App.
1930
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case, as disclosed by the record, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, directed by the court, was the only possible legal verdict that could have been rendered. No motion for a new trial was made, and the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the direction of the verdict.

2. It appearing to this court that the writ of error in this case must have been prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error, that ten per cent, damages be assessed against the plaintiff in error, is granted.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Amerson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 10, 1930
Citation: 153 S.E. 778
Docket Number: 20530
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.