Case Information
*2 Before J ILL P RYOR , B RANCH , and K IDD , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Landmark American Insurance Company (“Landmark”) ap- peals from the July 17, 2024, stipulation of voluntary dismissal of TSG Industries Inc. (“TSG”) as well as various interlocutory orders, including the November 17, 2022, judgment in which the district court found it liable to plaintiffs Amerisure Insurance Company and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (collectively, “Am- erisure”). We dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Landmark’s previ- ous appeal from the November 17, 2022, judgment because the *3 24-12674 Opinion of the Court 3 claims relating to TSG had not been resolved at that time. See Am- erisure Ins. Co. v. Auchter Co. , 94 F.4th 1307, 1311-12 (11th Cir. 2024).
Amerisure moves to dismiss this appeal because the district court had not entered a final judgment at the time that Landmark filed the operative August 16, 2024, notice of appeal. [1] Landmark responds that it filed its operative notice from the July 17 stipula- tion out of an abundance of caution and it does not oppose dismis- sal of this appeal.
We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal be- cause the district court had not entered a final judgment at the time that Landmark filed the operative August 16, 2024, notice of ap- peal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City , 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000). Specifically, the claims regard- ing TSG had not been resolved at that time because the July 17, 2024, stipulation of voluntary dismissal of TSG was ineffective un- der Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). See Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant , 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012). That is because Arch Insurance Company (“Arch”), which had ap- peared in the action, did not sign the stipulation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); City of Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Hosp. Holdings, L.P. , 82 F.4th 1031, 1038 (11th Cir. 2023). Although the court dismissed Arch from the action when it granted Arch’s Rule 25 motion to substitute Amerisure for it, Arch was still required to sign the stip- ulation because even parties who have been dismissed from an *4 action are required to sign a Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) stipulation if they have appeared. See City of Jacksonville , 82 F.4th at 1038 (“[A]ll means all.”).
It does not matter for purposes of this appeal whether the October 29, 2024, order dismissing TSG was effective under Rule 41(a)(2) or if the December 13 and 16, 2024, order and judgment effectively resolved all pending claims because “[a] premature no- tice of appeal filed from an interlocutory order that is not immedi- ately appealable is not cured by a subsequent final judgment.” See Robinson v. Tanner , 798 F.2d 1378, 1385 (11th Cir. 1986).
Accordingly, we GRANT Amerisure’s motion to dismiss and DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
NOTES
[1] Amerisure also sought attorney fees and costs but withdrew that request.