No. 525 | SCOTUS | Nov 13, 1933

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a -substantial federal question. (1) Ex parte Poresky, ante, p. 30; Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103" date_filed="1933-04-10" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin">289 U.S. 103, 105; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U.S. 308" date_filed="1902-12-01" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown">187 U. S. 308, 311; Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U.S. 20" date_filed="1917-11-05" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Contributors to the Pennsylvania Hospital v. City of Philadelphia">245 U.S. 20, 24; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191" date_filed="1929-01-02" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. Smith">278 U.S. 191. (2) Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U.S. 138" date_filed="1914-01-19" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Patsone v. Pennsylvania">232 U.S. 138, 144; Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117" date_filed="1929-11-25" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Silver v. Silver">280 U.S. 117, 123; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374" date_filed="1932-05-23" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Sproles v. Binford">286 U.S. 374, 396. (3) United States v. Grimaud, 220 U.S. 506" date_filed="1911-05-03" court="SCOTUS" case_name="United States v. Grimaud">220 U.S. 506, 516, 518; United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1" date_filed="1926-10-11" court="SCOTUS" case_name="United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.">272 U.S. 1, 11, 12; Hampton & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 394" date_filed="1928-04-09" court="SCOTUS" case_name="J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States">276 U.S. 394, 406, 407.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.