midpage

American Bank & Trust Co. v. LichtensteinAmerican Bank & Trust Co. v. Lichtenstein

New York Court of Appeals
Jun 2, 1976
Versions:39 N.Y.2d 857
352 N.E.2d 132
386 N.Y.S.2d 215
1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2806

Memorandum. Order affirmed on the memorandum opinion at the Appellate Division.

This action is predicated on the series of promissory notes and not on the theory of an account stated, and accordingly judgment may be entered under CPLR 3213 (contrast Interman Ind. Prods, v R. S. M. Electron Power, 37 NY2d 151). We do not consider the additional contentions presented by appellants for the first time in this court (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 162, p 629 et seq.).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: American Bank & Trust Co. v. Lichtenstein
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 2, 1976
Citations: 39 N.Y.2d 857; 352 N.E.2d 132; 386 N.Y.S.2d 215; 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2806
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In