201 N.W. 503 | Mich. | 1924
This case was in this court on a former *469
occasion, and will be found reported in
The same questions are re-argued in counsel's briefs as were argued on its first appearance. There appears, to be no new questions raised. We may dispose of the matter by saying we are still of the opinion that the interpretation given to section 5 of the uniform bill of lading by Mr. Justice McKenna inMichigan Cent. R. Co. v. Owen, supra, must determine the me adversely to the contention of the railway garnishee.
The judgment is affirmed.
CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, SHARPE, MOORE, STEERE, FELLOWS, and WIEST, JJ., concurred. *470