History
  • No items yet
midpage
Althouse v. Hunsberger
6 Pa. Super. 160
Pa. Super. Ct.
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The very earnest argument of the defendant’s counsel has failed to convince us that the court committed error in discharging the rule entered in the present case or in entering judgment in the succeeding case. Its action in both cases is so thoroughly vindicated in the opinions filed as to render further discussion unnecessary and unprofitable.

Order affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: Althouse v. Hunsberger
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 18, 1897
Citation: 6 Pa. Super. 160
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 92
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.